• SELECTED PROJECTS
  • About
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • IMPACT & METHODOLOGY
  • ARTIST STATEMENT
  • Contact
freskoimageworks.com
  • SELECTED PROJECTS
  • About
  • Curriculum Vitae
  • IMPACT & METHODOLOGY
  • ARTIST STATEMENT
  • Contact

The Recurring Dream

THE DREAM - Digital Painting using Photoshop by Francisco Escobar ©FRESKO IMAGEWORKS INC. 2026

For a long time, I misunderstood the nature of this dream. At first glance, it presented itself as something simple, almost embarrassingly human in its familiarity: a sex dream. A clandestine rendezvous. Desire. Intimacy deferred but anticipated. The subconscious staging its usual theater of longing. But recurring dreams are rarely about the thing they initially appear to be about. Desire is often merely the disguise deeper psychological tensions wear in order to gain entry into consciousness. This particular dream, over time, revealed itself to be something far stranger.

It always begins the same way.

I am walking through an abandoned train yard. The atmosphere is empty but not lifeless. There is a profound stillness to the space, as though it exists outside of ordinary time. Sand covers much of the ground. Rusted tracks disappear into fog. The geometry of the place feels vaguely industrial yet surreal, almost theatrical in its emptiness. The landscape itself feels psychologically symbolic rather than physically literal, Daliesque in the truest sense. A place constructed not from geography, but from emotional architecture.

There is an abandoned boxcar sitting alone on a piece of track. I know instinctively that this is where I am supposed to go. The destination never changes. Alongside my path there is always water. At first, only a narrow stream. Running water accompanying my walk toward the boxcar. Each time the dream recurs, the water changes. It becomes wider, deeper, more difficult to cross.

What once existed as a manageable stream slowly transforms into something immense and consuming, swallowing more and more of the landscape each time the dream returns. The widening feels significant. Evolutionary. As though something unresolved inside me is expanding rather than diminishing. The purpose of the journey initially appears erotic. I am moving toward a secret tryst with someone familiar to me. A man whose presence feels emotionally intimate despite the fact that I cannot identify him specifically. His face never fully resolves because it is not truly one face at all. He is an amalgamation. A composite figure assembled unconsciously from every person I have ever loved, desired, pursued, or emotionally attached myself to. This detail feels essential.

The dream is not truly about one individual person. It is about intimacy itself. Or perhaps more accurately, longing itself. Because I never actually reach him. I move toward him. I attempt to kiss him. He moves away. Not cruelly. Not mockingly. More like a figure obeying rules I do not understand. He beckons me forward while remaining perpetually beyond reach. There is invitation without fulfillment. Nearness without arrival. And eventually I follow him into the water.

This is where the dream transforms emotionally.

The water stops functioning as scenery and becomes force. Current begins pulling against me. Mud forms beneath my feet, slowing movement, trapping my legs, resisting progress. Sometimes I nearly reach his outstretched hand before the current drags me sideways. Other times I become stuck entirely while he disappears slowly into the fog ahead of me.

And every time, the feeling is identical: Panic. Longing. Disorientation. The terror of losing both direction and self simultaneously.

For years I struggled to understand why the emotional atmosphere of the dream felt so familiar until I realized my thoughts consistently returned to Season of Migration to the North. Not simply because of the imagery of drowning, though that is certainly part of it. The famous sequence where the narrator fights desperately against the river while suspended between surrender and survival carries almost the exact emotional texture of this dream. That sensation of being overtaken by forces larger than oneself while still compulsively moving toward them. But the deeper connection, I think, lies elsewhere. The dream feels tied to the novel’s obsession with fractured identity and the impossibility of belonging fully anywhere.

In Season of Migration to the North, identity is unstable, hybridized, fragmented by geography, memory, colonialism, sexuality, masculinity, longing, performance, and displacement. The characters exist in a perpetual state of psychological in-betweenness. Never fully belonging to one world or another. Never entirely at home within themselves. Mustafa Sa’eed in particular becomes a figure constructed through projection — desired, mythologized, misunderstood, fragmented into versions of himself depending on who is perceiving him.

That feels deeply connected to the dream.

The man I pursue is not a singular person because perhaps he represents not simply lovers, but every fragmented version of intimacy and identity I have attempted to anchor myself within. He is familiarity without fixedness. Recognition without stability. Desire assembled from memory rather than reality. Perhaps the widening water represents the growing emotional complexity of identity itself.

Because identity is never static. The older we become, the more psychologically layered we become. Every relationship alters us. Every rejection reshapes us. Every migration between social worlds, emotional states, communities, aesthetics, and selves leaves residue behind. We become accumulations. The dream increasingly feels less like a pursuit of another person and more like a pursuit of coherence.

The abandoned train yard reinforces this feeling. Rail yards are places of transition. Arrival and departure. Human movement. Temporary belonging. But this one is abandoned. Movement interrupted. Connection decayed. The tracks remain, but whatever once traveled through them no longer does. That feels important because there is a peculiar loneliness that emerges when one exists perpetually between categories. Between communities. Between identities. Between forms of belonging. Too fluid for one space, yet too contradictory for another. Too emotionally aware to fully surrender to performance, but too psychologically fragmented to feel entirely settled within authenticity either.

The dream captures this emotional geography perfectly. Even the fog contributes to it. There is no horizon, no direct source of light, no clear orientation. Everything exists in ambiguity. Perhaps that ambiguity is the point.

The figure in the water beckons me forward, but never allows contact because the dream itself may understand something I consciously resist admitting: perhaps the longing itself is more stable than fulfillment would be. Perhaps pursuit has become psychologically safer than arrival or perhaps the figure represents reconciliation with selfhood, a selfhood perpetually deferred.

There is also something deeply revealing about the fact that I continue following him despite the repeated failure. Despite the panic. Despite nearly drowning each time. Some part of me still enters the water willingly, still choosing pursuit over retreat, which may ultimately connect most strongly to the ending of Season of Migration to the North itself. The narrator suspended in water. He is caught between annihilation and continuation. Crying out not for certainty, but simply for life.

Perhaps that is what this dream actually is beneath all its erotic imagery and surreal symbolism: not a fantasy of intimacy, but a psychological struggle over whether one can ever truly belong to another person, to a place, to an identity, or even fully to oneself. Perhaps the reason the dream recurs is because I still do not know the answer.

tags: #ReflectiveWriting #VisualStorytelling #CreativePractice #PhilosophyOfLife
Friday 07.03.26
Posted by FRESKO IMAGEWORKS
 

Admiration vs. Objectification: A Necessary Distinction

SOUTH STREET, PHILADELPHIA © FRESKO IMAGEWORKS INC. 2024

There is a subtle but important distinction between being admired and being objectified—one that is often blurred, especially within hookup culture among gay men. On the surface, the two can feel similar. Both involve attention. Both can involve desire. Both can, at times, feel validating. But beneath that surface, they are fundamentally different experiences, shaped by intention, depth, and the way one is truly seen.

In environments where attraction is immediate and often visually driven, it becomes easy to conflate admiration with objectification. A compliment on appearance, a lingering glance, a direct expression of sexual interest—these can all register as forms of being desired. And in a culture that frequently places a premium on physicality, that desire can feel affirming. It can feel like recognition, like approval, like a kind of currency. But admiration and objectification do not operate on the same level.

Admiration involves recognition of the whole person. It may begin with physical attraction, but it does not end there. It carries with it a sense of curiosity, respect, and an interest in the individual beyond what is immediately visible. To be admired is to feel seen—not just for how you look, but for how you think, how you move through the world, how you exist as a complete human being. There is an element of presence in admiration, a willingness to engage with complexity rather than reduce it.

Objectification, on the other hand, is inherently reductive. It isolates one aspect of a person—most often their physical body—and elevates it above all else. In doing so, it strips away context, personality, and depth, reducing the individual to something that can be consumed, evaluated, or desired in a purely transactional way. It is not about who you are, but about what you represent in a given moment.

Within hookup culture, these two experiences are often intertwined to the point of being indistinguishable. Interactions are frequently brief, driven by immediacy, and centered around physical attraction. In that space, objectification can easily be mistaken for admiration, because both are expressed through desire. But desire alone is not enough to constitute admiration. Without recognition of the person beyond the body, it remains surface-level.

This is not to suggest that objectification is always harmful or entirely avoidable. In certain contexts, it may even be mutually understood and accepted as part of the dynamic. The issue arises when it is misinterpreted—when being desired for one’s body is mistaken for being valued as a person. That confusion can lead to a kind of emotional dissonance, where the attention received feels affirming in the moment, but ultimately leaves something unfulfilled.

Understanding the difference between admiration and objectification often comes with maturity. It requires a shift in perspective—one that moves beyond immediate validation and begins to question the quality of the attention being received. It involves asking not just “Am I desired?” but “Am I seen?” Not just “Am I wanted?” but “Am I valued?”

This awareness can change how we navigate relationships and interactions. It can influence what we accept, what we seek, and what we recognize as meaningful. It can also reshape how we view ourselves, helping to disentangle self-worth from purely physical validation. In a culture where attention is often fleeting and surface-driven, the ability to distinguish between admiration and objectification becomes an important form of self-awareness. It allows us to engage more intentionally, to recognize when we are being reduced, and to seek out connections that acknowledge us more fully. While being desired can feel good, being truly seen is something else entirely.

tags: #AdmirationOrObjectification, #SeenOrUsed, #DesireVsRespect, #AmIJustABody, #PrettyButReplaceable, #KnowYourWorthOrDont, #HookupCultureTruth, #GayDatingReality, #SurfaceLevelOrReal, #DoYouEvenSeeMe, #BodyFirstPersonSecond, #ValidationOrConnection, #AttentionIsntAffection, #LustVsLove, #UsedOrValued, #ThisIsTheProblem, #LetsTalkAboutIt, #UncomfortableTruth, #RealTalkOnly, #ModernIntimacy, #AreWeOkay, #SayItOutLoud, #NoFilterTruth, #DatingIsBroken, #WakeUpCall, #ReflectiveWriting #VisualStorytelling #CreativePractice #PhilosophyOfLife, #VisualStorytelling #DocumentaryPhotography #ReflectiveWriting #CreativePractice #thoughtsonpride
Friday 06.26.26
Posted by FRESKO IMAGEWORKS
 

A Sermon on Morals and Values

LOVE BREEDS LOVE - Photo by Francisco Escobar ©FRESKO IMAGEWORKS INC. 2015

Creationism is not a moral principle. It is not a virtue. It is not evidence of wisdom, integrity, compassion, or spiritual depth. Believing that the Earth was created in a manner completely contradictory to observable natural laws does not make someone righteous any more than believing the moon is made of porcelain makes someone enlightened. Quoting scripture does not make you a prophet. Sitting in church every Sunday does not make you holy. Public declarations of faith do not automatically transform a person into a decent human being. Far too many people confuse religious performance with moral substance.

At some point, Christianity in America became less about practicing faith and more about signaling tribal allegiance. Entire communities now seem to believe that salvation hinges on affirming a checklist of cultural talking points rather than embodying any meaningful ethical framework. Did God create the Earth in six literal days? Was Eve assembled from Adam’s rib? Did Noah fit every species on a wooden boat? These questions have somehow become litmus tests for spiritual legitimacy, despite having virtually nothing to do with whether someone lives with kindness, mercy, humility, generosity, or justice.

What that reveals is the uncomfortable truth underneath much of modern religious identity: for many people, it was never really about morality. It was about obedience. Obedience to authority. Obedience to tradition. Obedience to ideology. Obedience to the group.

Because if your entire sense of morality collapses the moment other people stop behaving according to your standards, then what you possess is not morality at all. It is social dependency disguised as virtue. If you require an entire society to mirror your values before you yourself can act ethically, then your ethics were never internalized in the first place. Real morality exists independently of surveillance and social conformity.

A genuinely moral person does not need legislation to practice compassion. They do not require public recognition to demonstrate kindness. They do not need the threat of eternal punishment to refrain from cruelty. Their principles exist because they have consciously cultivated them as part of their character. Morals and values are not abstract slogans. They can actually be measured through behavior.

Kindness can be measured. Generosity can be measured. Justice can be measured. Charity can be measured. Mercy can be measured. Benevolence can be measured. These things manifest concretely in how people treat others, particularly those they dislike, disagree with, or have power over. A person’s faith is not revealed through bumper stickers, Bible verses, or social media declarations. It is revealed in how they behave when empathy is inconvenient. Yet many self-proclaimed Christians spend extraordinary amounts of time obsessing over symbolic gestures while neglecting the actual labor of living faith. They will argue endlessly about creationism, biblical literalism, prayer in schools, or whether someone says “Merry Christmas,” while simultaneously displaying staggering cruelty toward immigrants, the poor, addicts, minorities, queer people, or anyone existing outside their ideological tribe. One begins to suspect that belief itself has become a substitute for moral action as though accepting a supernatural claim automatically absolves someone of the responsibility to become a better human being. It is as though God is less concerned with cruelty, greed, arrogance, dishonesty, or indifference than with whether someone intellectually accepts a Bronze Age cosmology. The absurdity becomes impossible to ignore.

If someone genuinely believes they are “saved” because they accept that God created the Earth in six days, got bored, and decided to experiment with gardening, while simultaneously ignoring every practical demand of compassion, humility, charity, and mercy contained within the teachings they claim to follow, then what they possess is not spirituality. IT IS IDEOLOGICAL VANITY.

Perhaps this explains why some of the cruelest people imaginable often consider themselves deeply religious. Their faith functions not as a path toward self-examination, but as a shield protecting them from it. Once convinced they belong to the morally chosen group, introspection becomes unnecessary. They no longer evaluate whether they are kind, fair, honest, or compassionate because they have outsourced morality entirely to identity and doctrine. But morality is not what one professes, it is what one practices.

A hateful Christian is not morally superior to a compassionate atheist simply because one attends church and the other does not. If anything, the compassionate atheist may embody the ethical teachings of Christ more sincerely than the person loudly proclaiming salvation while treating others with contempt. This is the part many people desperately avoid confronting: belief alone is cheap.

Anyone can claim righteousness. Anyone can quote scripture. Anyone can participate in rituals. The difficult part is becoming the kind of person whose actions consistently reflect empathy, integrity, humility, and grace. That requires effort. That requires self-awareness. That requires accountability. Most importantly, it requires recognizing that morality is demonstrated through conduct, not declared through affiliation.

So no, creationism is not a moral value. Blind obedience is not virtue. Public religiosity is not evidence of character. And if your version of faith produces arrogance, cruelty, intolerance, self-righteousness, and hostility toward others, then whatever spirit you are serving, it certainly is not one rooted in love, mercy, or wisdom.

That was my sermon. STOP BEING AN ASSHOLE!

tags: #ReflectiveWriting #VisualStorytelling #CreativePractice #PhilosophyOfLife
Friday 06.19.26
Posted by FRESKO IMAGEWORKS
 

Motion Picture & Print Photography by FRANCISCO ESCOBAR